Last Updated on January 16, 2021 by bricoleur

Click on each thumbnail image to enlarge, or to view as slideshow.
Chris Marker, Le fond de l’air est rouge Chris Marker, A Farewell to Movies. Abschied vom Kino Alexandre Kha, L’Attrapeur d’images Chris Marker, Le Coeur net Chris Marker, Giraudoux par lui-même Chris Marker, Passengers Chris Marker, Le Dépays Candy wrapper in Chris Marker book Chris Marker, La Jetée ciné-roman Chris Marker, Owls at Noon. Prelude: The Hollow Men Chris Marker, Coréennes Chris Marker, Commentaires La Corée, le voyage vers l’est Chris Marker, Coréennes — English text Darke, Van Assche, Peterson – A Grin Without a Cat — Whitechapel Chris Marker, Coréennes — Korean ed. Chris Marker, Staring Back Chris Marker, Kommentare 1 — German ed. Chris Marker, Die Untrüglichen – German translation of Le Coeur Net (thanks to DK) atelier de Chris Marker André-Clement Decouflé, L’An 2000 Chris Marker, Commentaires 2 La Renfermée La Corse Esprit: Les engagements de Chris Marker Binczek & Rass, Hg., sie wollen eben sein, was sie sind, nämlich bilder:.. Anschlüße an Chris Marker Le Coeur Net graphic Petite Planète book series – Seuil CM books Montaigne manuscript page atelier de Chris Marker L’Avant Scène Cinéma, Spécial Chris Marker ZOO after Petite Planète series Gavin Keeney, Dossier Chris Marker. The Suffering Image. Chris Darke, La Jetée Arnaud Lambert, Also Known as Chris Marker Sarah Cooper, Chris Marker Vincent Jacques, Chris Marker, Les Médias et le XXe siècle: Le Revers de l’histoire contemporaine Maroussia Vossen, Chris Marker (le livre impossible) Vincent Jacques, ed., CHRIS.MARKER.PHOTOGRAPHIE Pourvali Bamchade, Chris Marker Nadine Boljkovac, Untimely Affects: Gilles Deleuze and an Ethics of Cinema Francois Maspero, Cat’s Grin Christina Scherer, Ivans Marker Godard Jarman Théorème 6 Recherches Sur Chris Marker Catherine Lupton, Chris Marker: Memories of the Future Guy Gauthier, Chris Marker, écrivain multimédia, ou Voyage à travers les médias You Only Live Twice: Sex, Death and Transition, book by Chase Joynt and Mike Hoolboom Michel Beaujour, Miroirs d’encre + Bellour, L’Entre-images dlp library Bartos & MacCabe, Studio: Remembering Chris Marker Susan Howe, Sorting Facts: or, Nineteen Ways of Looking at Marker Cinémathèque française CHRIS MARKER catalog Raymond Bellour, L’Entre-images 2: Mots, Images Raymond Bellour, Between-the-Images Raymond Bellour, Le Corps du cinéma: Mots, Images Cinémaction, Chris Marker pionnier et novateur Raymond Bellour, La Querelle des dispositifs: Cinéma – installations, expositions Mars book in Toute la mémoire du monde Petite Planète books CHRIS MARKER INMEMORIA Green & Pinto, La Zona Marker Tode & Kämper, Chris Marker Filmessayist Sandor Krasna, Goodbye Mr. Gorky Chris Marker et l’imprimerie du regard Michel de Montaigne, On Friendship Adolfo Bioy Casares, The Invention of Morel poptronics guillaume-en-égypte au brasil / no brasil Chris Marker, Silent Movie brochure
Cabinets of curiosities (also known in German loanwords as Kunstkabinett, Kunstkammer or Wunderkammer; also Cabinets of Wonder, and wonder-rooms) were collections of notable objects. The term cabinet originally described a room rather than a piece of furniture. Modern terminology would categorize the objects included as belonging to natural history (sometimes faked), geology, ethnography, archaeology, religious or historical relics, works of art (including cabinet paintings), and antiquities. The classic cabinet of curiosities emerged in the sixteenth century, although more rudimentary collections had existed earlier. In addition to the most famous and best-documented cabinets of rulers and aristocrats, members of the merchant class and early practitioners of science in Europe formed collections that were precursors to museums.
Cabinets of curiosities served not only as collections to reflect the particular curiosities of their curators but as social devices to establish and uphold rank in society. There are said to be two main types of cabinets. As R. J. W. Evans notes, there could be “the princely cabinet, serving a largely representational function, and dominated by aesthetic concerns and a marked predilection for the exotic,” or the less grandiose, “the more modest collection of the humanist scholar or virtuoso, which served more practical and scientific purposes.” Evans goes on to explain that “no clear distinction existed between the two categories: all collecting was marked by curiosity, shading into credulity, and by some sort of universal underlying design”.
Cabinet of curiosities – Wikipedia
Wow!